DiCaprio Turns Hitman For Blood On Snow

Leonardo DiCaprio is reportedly in advance talks to join Blood on Snow a new thriller with Safe House director Daniel Espionosa already attached behind the camera. DiCaprio is set to produce and star in the tale of a hitman forced to go on the run with his supposed target, his boss’s wife, having apparently failed to kill her.

The project should prove at the very least a handy way for poor Leo to get rid of some pent up Oscar night angst…

Edge Of Tomorrow Doug Liman Interview

Director Doug Liman presented a special preview screening of extensive footage from his new science fiction epic Edge of Tomorrow, starring Tom Cruise and Emily Blunt in London today. The film is based on the cult classic book All You Need Is Kill and follows one soldier’s quest to win a war against an alien invasion after he discovers an amazing ability to be reincarnated on the eve of battle every time he dies. Read the full Interview transcript below:

Q. You’ve made eclectic films in the past, but what was it about this story that you wanted to explore?

It’s so rare these days to find a film that both fulfils a big studio appetite and at the same time is wholly original. You tend to see a lot of very big movies but it feel like you’ve seen it before, usually because you have! Or you see eclectic and original movies but they’re much smaller. Occasionally a project comes along that has the scope of Edge of Tomorrow but at the same time is 100% original.

I live in New York I don’t live in Hollywood and I hang out with a more eclectic artsy crowd. It’s the kind of crowd who I’m going to talk more about Emily Blunt when I’m pushing the film. They’re a snooty artsy crowd so otherwise they’d be like you’re doing what? There’s time travel and aliens? They’re very judgmental.

I was at a party in Williamsberg over Christmas and this woman was like “Oh Tom Cruise.. Emily Blunt.. Big Hollywood Movie… I bet they live happily ever after at the end of the film even though he’s so much older than her”. I told her how the film actually goes  and this woman’s jaw just dropped. People just expect such a formulaic thing from Hollywood so when you have the opportunity to break the mould you should.

I’m in a really unique place because when I got my first studio film in Bourne Identity I was so terrified of selling out I was deliberately trying to b as contrary as I could at every stage. I was changing things for no other reason than because other people had done it before a certain way.  I went into the film determined it wasn’t going to be like other movies. Even though I didn’t know what it was going to actually be like. Many stories have been written about the turmoil on set but the end result was because of me saying I’m not going to make a cookie cutter movie and fighting the studio along every step of the way. It ended up with a film I was especially proud of and spawned a whole franchise. So it put me in a unique place where people expect me to break the mould a bit.

With a project like Edge of Tomorrow everybody wanted me to change it up. There was no pressure from Warner Bros to make this look like a standard studio film. They wanted to do something fresh and occasionally I’d pitch them an idea and they’d tell me it wasn’t ‘Doug Liman enough’. They meant that when people think of me they expect something more contrary and maybe a bit more rebellious.

I didn’t plan it but I’m in this really unique place where the people around me push me to try and shake it up and do something you haven’t seen before.

Q. Tell us about the tone of the film and how it balances real laughs with a lot of sci-fi action and war drama?

Everyone knows that Emily Blunt is a great comedic actress but Tom is a truly brilliant comedic actor. He’s really the gutsiest most courageous actor I’ve ever worked with. He will try anything. He’s made so many films, but it’s not like working with someone like Brad Pitt who often makes films that mass audiences don’t always see. It’s unusual for Brad Pitt to do a big commercial movie like Mr & Mrs Smith, a lot of the time he chooses artsy stuff. But with Tom the world has seen every single movie he’s ever done. So with Tom needs to find the opportunity to play a character he hasn’t played before and be a Tom Cruise you haven’t seen before.

Tom is a total coward in this movie not just in the beginning but all the way through. He doesn’t just become a hero. He squeals so many times throughout the movie, though he does have an amazing squeal!  Other movie stars in my experience would be more hesitant about being that vulnerable.

We have something for everybody because if you love Tom Cruise this is Tom giving a genius performance and if you hate Tom Cruise he dies like 200 times in the movie!

Q. What was the first Tom Cruise film you ever saw and what excited you about him as an actor?

I’ve seen every film Tom has ever done, but maybe Risky Business may have been the first one I saw. He is a true movie star. You go on the journey with him whatever happens. You’re in his shoes and care about him. He’s s ridiculously charming, not just on screen but in real life. He’s just gusty, not just in the way he’ll hang off of tall buildings, but he’ll be emotionally gutsy in trying something he’s never done before.  He’s not just doing the same character over and over again. I’ve always love him from afar.

People in the film business always have to say nice things about people they work with. But you’ll never find anyone who has worked with Tom who doesn’t rave about him. He was extraordinary. The level of excellence he brings to set and expects everyone else to bring was inspiring. He’s so hard working and we shot seven days a week because we wanted to make a film that was bigger than the budget could afford.

I suggested we shot seven days a week and used two crews to get an extra 20 days of shooting in and Tom agreed to it. I remember at one point early off in the shoot I heard Tom talking to the producers about having one day off early in November. I finally realised was not a week day off, just one day off sometime in the whole month of November because he had something else he needed to do. Other than that one day we shot the entire month!

Q. What made Emily Blunt such an important part of the project?

She was really my partner in this because Tom and I working together is a little bit like a Reece’s peanut butter cup it’s the peanut butter and the chocolate meeting. Tom comes from mainstream global box offices, while I come from a place where I care much more about this niche audience and more intelligentsia types. He cares more about making sure a mainstream audience gets it. Emily was my partner because she comes from the same place so she gets me. It was an amazing partnership and collaboration because I think what we’ve accomplished is something that appeals to Tom’s traditional audience but allows me to hold my head high when my friends in Brooklyn see it.

Q. The film was originally expected to be called All You Need Is Kill can you tell us why it changed to Edge of Tomorrow?

We never actually called it All You Need Is Kill, we called it AYNIK on set in the course of making the film. All You Need Is Kill was the title of the original Japanese novel the film is based on but it has nothing to do with the movie at all. Right from the beginning I knew we were obviously not going to call the movie that. Titles changes are always tough and it’s always better if you have the title before you start. But in this case we also were finding the tone of the film as we went along.

I genuinely believe in humour. I come from a Jewish family and among my relatives I find we bring humour to some of the darkest moments. But I didn’t know that Tom was going to be as funny as he was in the course of making this film so the tone of the film didn’t get defined until we started shooting it. Once we found that tone All You Need Is Kill was way too dark for a film that has a huge amount of humour all the way through. The film is not a comedy but in absurd moments I believe in characters that turn to it.

Q. What were you experiences of filming here in the UK?

This was my first time shooting an entire movie here in England and it really was an extraordinary experience. I’ve tried elsewhere in Europe and the experience has always been that when you need a specialist you fly them in for England. Whatever department when you need someone really great they always come from England. You bring them over to the Czech Republic, Romania or France wherever. That’s expensive obviously, but working here I got the opportunity to work with the best in every single department so that experience was extraordinary.

The thing about working with Tom is that physically moving him around is so expensive. Also your weather is not great here. We have a film that take place almost entirely outside and also it’s the same day repeating. My normal experience is that if it’s raining we just shoot in the rain, but for this project it can’t be raining if it wasn’t raining the day before. The end result was that we shot the entire movie on the stage and back lot of Leavesden studio. We were the first film in there after it was renovated and it’s got 100s of acres of back lot.  So basically everything you see was built on the back lot. So if it was raining we could move inside and if he sun came back out we could go straight back out. It was my first time shooting a movie when almost everything happened on the back lot and I loved it.

The only time we really left it was to go to Trafalgar square where we got to land a massive military helicopter in the heart of the square. That was one of those moments. I’m not jaded, but a moment like that you’re back t being a kid. I’m like “Oh my God this is the magic of the movies!” We only had 3 hours to shoot so I had to get that out of my system quickly and get working.

Q. What’s coming up next for you?

I’m interested in a wide range. I’m not sure what my next film is but one of them is period movie about George Mallory. I’d also love to find a small comedy. I don’t crave the big set experience. In fact my favourite moments on Edge of Tomorrow were the small reshoots I did with Tom Cruise. It was like being back to Swingers. I had a green screen set up in the editing room at Warner Bros in Burbank. We had to sneak some lights in because this was not union and totally unauthorised. Tom had to do his own makeup and hair. We did shots that are in the movie because we thought we could get a better performance or change a line of dialogue. But that’s where my heart is it’s in that real Guerrilla moment of just me an actor and a camera. With Edge of Tomorrow the whole film feels like it was shot that way even though it was obviously shot on a massive budget with a cast of thousands. It feels like a really personal story and that never got lost. I’d love to find a small movie I could just shoot the whole movie that way.

Q. Are ever going to see a sequel to Jumper?

I have a lot of ideas for a sequel to Jumper. To me of all my film’s that’s the one I didn’t get quite right. But I’m very good at learning from my mistakes and growing. Most people won’t know this but I made a film before Swingers that didn’t quite work out. But I learnt form that and I brought what I learnt to Swingers. I’m very good at being an honest critic of myself and what I can do better. A lot of what I learnt from Jumper I then applied to Edge of Tomorrow. It is an Arena I’d love to go back to.

Q. What do people like Emily and Bill Paxton bring to the film?

She’s the only one we wanted. It was one of these things where if we couldn’t have gotten her I’m not sure what would have happened. We didn’t have a plan B. We had to surround Tom by amazing actors. Bill Paxton was extraordinary in the movie in a role which you’ve kind of seen before. It’s like oh he’s the drill sergeant. There are these sorts of cliché things. It’s the military; they operate in a certain way so there’s only so much latitude you can have about a sergeant who’s in charge of a platoon. Paxton created a character that is just completely original.

I workshop character with actors and in the case of Bill he was talking about the role and in our first conversation he started riffing a character that believed in battle and saw battle as the great leveler. He believed that dying a hero’s death I battle and winning were both equally positive outcomes. You almost have a religious belief in death in battle being a good thing. If you’re Tom Cruise’s character obviously that’s your worst nightmare. I mean you want a sergeant that wants everybody to live. From that point we built a wonderful character that makes a great foil for Tom. With Tom it’s like playing tennis, if you’re playing with someone better your game comes up.

Emily is just an extraordinarily powerful actress. She really stands her ground even though she was in way over her head in this movie in terms of Tom having done big action movies and she hasn’t. That didn’t stop her at all. We had a very safe environment in which to work. Early on in the process there was a lot of stress. I don’t always hold it together. Early on we were having a script meeting with Tom and Emily. Emily mad a suggestion and I snapped at her a little bit. She was like Jesus I’m just trying; I’ve never made a movie like this before. I said I’ve never made a movie like this before either. So it was like okay we can all admit we’ve never made a movie like this before. It’s now a safe space for everyone to toss ideas out. That was really a critical moment in the process early on. From that point forward it was a completely safe environment. I don’t think I’ve had that safe an environment on set since I did Swingers.

When we did Swingers we couldn’t afford a camera that did sound. The whole thing about a film camera is that they sound like a sewing machine unless you get one expensive enough to be quieter. We couldn’t afford that so I had to take a French camera and wrap it in my old skiing jacket. In some scenes if we were closer to the actors I’d then wrap it again in my blanket from my bed. Jon Favreau used to describe it as acting to a big snowball because there as this big puffy thing on my shoulder. But it created an environment where Jon and Vince felt completely safe to try things because they looked at me and I have my bedding wrapped around the camera and it was like anything goes.

Now you have a giant movie star like Tom who is okay with trying anything and is encouraging everyone else to do that. You feel like he’s got the most to lose because he’s at the top of the pyramid. Usually those are the guys who play it the safest. So that’s an inspiring place to find yourself as a filmmaker.

Q. How easy was it adapting the original book?

You would be forgiven for assuming it’s a manga because it’s Japanese. So when I started working on this I thought great I’m going to get to look at all the pictures in the book and see what all the aliens and exo-suits look like. But the Japanese actually do write some books without pictures in them and this happened to be one of them. It was akin to adapting the Bourne Identity; I just had words to go on. But I had an amazing art department and the irony of the process was that the design of the movie got ahead of the script. I had meeting with Tom and the producers presenting pictures and they noticed most of these scenes weren’t currently in the script. I said I know but they eventually will be. So we first turned the book into a comic book and images. Then from those images we developed the scripts.

Q. How specifically did you develop the aliens?

If you saw my inspiration for the aliens it was this video we found on YouTube of just a pulsating cube that was vibrating. All I had was that. I was not making a movie about an alien invasion. I was just in this arena in terms of the effect it has on the characters. Aliens don’t necessarily bring out the best character development as illustrated by a lot of the most recent alien invasion movies. Dying and repeating the day brings out a lot of interesting character issues. Having to reintroduce yourself to Emily Blunt every day is really interesting. In particular unlike something like Groundhog Day where Bill Murray has all the power, you have a character like Emily Blunt who doesn’t have the power but has an awareness that this power exists and is incredibly smart. So even though she can’t remember the previous days they’ve lived. Based on his action she can deduce what might have happened and call bullshit on certain things. I loved that. I’m a great believer of the brain as a super power as well. In this movie you really have two super heroes. One of them has a legitimate super power and the other ones super power is that she’s incredibly smart and can deduce what’s happened on previous days.

Q. Few films are ambitious enough to tackle a concept like time loops for a feature length story, what excited you about that unique narrative structure and what frustrated you about it?

From a straight production point of view I was excited about the efficiency of filming because you’re going to the same locations over and over again. So we could block shoot and that allowed us to make a bigger film than our budget should really have allowed us to do. I had dreams of budget efficiency I was able to realise with this narrative structure. The thing that I loved most was the idea. I like putting real human beings through extraordinary situation. At the heart of it are real human beings. If you look at Mr & Mrs Smith there’s a real couple trying to look at the insecurities in their marriage and deal with their trust issues. There’s machine guns and outrageous stuff happening but all of that is about bringing out what’s interesting about the human beings.

I just thought with Edge of Tomorrow this is a concept that allowed me to really have a great love story between two people where they basically have to start over from scratch every day. Trying to figure out how to build a love story off of that was a really exciting challenge. It’s something that Tom and Emily did an extraordinary job accomplishing. Emily has it toughest because she has to always go back to square one, he gets to continuously evolve. But she has to reset to the same starting point every day but then over the course of different days she has to get to different places. So her performance is unbelievable.

The frustrating thing was trying to deal with the logic of a film which basically involves time travel. It’s so mind boggling, so challenging. People who dream that one day time travel might actually exist. All they have to do is just work on a film that involves time travel and you will at that point realise that there’s no way we will ever travel through time. There are just too many paradoxes. It’s just never going to happen!

Official Edge of Tomorrow Trailer below:

Doug Liman still eager for Jumper Sequel

Director Doug Liman has a track record for inventive and original storytelling. From his breakthrough success with Swingers through hits like Mr & Mrs Smith and The Bourne Identity. His latest film Edge of Tomorrow is an ambitious science fiction action epic that stars Tom Cruise in a plot that features time travel and an apocalyptic alien invasion.

Speaking at a preview screening in London Liman was asked whether or not he would still be interested in a sequel to Jumper, the intriguing but commercial unsuccessful effort. Here’s what he had to say about the prospect of a Jumper 2:

I have a lot of ideas for a sequel to Jumper. To me of all my film’s that’s the one I didn’t get quite right. But I’m very good at learning from my mistakes and growing. Most people won’t know this but I made a film before Swingers that didn’t quite work out. But I learnt form that and I brought what I learnt to Swingers. I’m very good at being an honest critic of myself and what I can do better. A lot of what I learnt from Jumper I then applied to Edge of Tomorrow. It is an Arena I’d love to go back to.

The original 2008 film starred Hayden Christensen, Jamie Bell, Rachel Bilson and Samuel L. Jackson. It explored the intriguing possibilities of teleportation but failed to capture audience imaginations. Although representing a rare box office disappointment for Liman, some fans have long speculated that with an improved script and updated cast it might still have franchise potential. Though it may still be a little premature for Hayden Christensen’s agent to start dusting of the telephone…

 

300: Rise of an Empire Review

The Plot:

A brave general Themistokles leads a band of inexperienced Greek warriors against the vast armies of the invading Persian Empire led by the depraved god-king Xerxes and Artemisia, the vengeful female commander of the feared Persian navy. Once again the defendant stand of a small band of warriors helps inspire the emerging Greek nation to stand up against a daunting tide of evil.  

The Good:

Those who perhaps found the original 2006 film 300 too horrifically violent may find the sequel’s commercially motivated move towards more teen friendly cartoonish action a welcome shift. Despite the near constant tide of death and graphic dismemberment, the film shouldn’t bother even squeamish audiences too much. The gushing spurts of CGI blood are so big and obviously fake that they ironically serve to conceal anything genuinely gory or unpleasant. The violence looks and feels more like a video game than the real horrors of ancient war. The film is too preoccupied with looking stylish to ever be genuinely terrifying or emotionally tense.

Eva Green is a captivating redeeming feature; almost single handily keeping this film watchable, despite some of its more obvious failings. Armed with a naturally piercing gaze and a dangerously sly smirk she is a seductively menacing presence. It’s rare and almost unique to find a villainess so genuinely ruthless and imposing on screen. The film even does her character the justice of giving her a credible backstory. In truth the film would almost have been better off focusing exclusively on her character’s story in its own right.

Such is the strength of Eva Green’s screen presence that not even gratuitous nudity or outlandish CGI blood splatters can obscure the quality of her performance. Of course a teenage target audience will almost certainly welcome Eva Green nudity even more than the endless slow motion fight sequences.

The Bad:

Leading man Sullivan Stapleton lacks the brutal macho charisma of Gerard Butler’s iconic portrayal of brave but doomed Sparta King Leonidas. Likewise the film’s supporting cast of Greek warriors feel at times like the poor muscle deprived cousins of the original film’s Spartan heroes. The 2006 original boasted a convincingly rugged cast that included Dominic West and Michael Fassbender. Skins star Jack O’Connell for example is a far less convincing shirtless soldier and sadly feels like a poor man’s substitute for more familiar faces.

The main problem for 300 Rise of an Empire is that it confusingly positions itself as a companion piece to the 2006 film, rather than just a straightforward sequel. The muddled timeline sees the story mostly unfold alongside the plot of the original film and frequently jump to older events to explain its elaborate backstory.

300 was a box office phenomenon which understandably left the studio and perhaps fans eager for more. But as a story it couldn’t have been more self-contained. Few endings are ever more definitive than everyone dying. Rise of an Empire struggles to reimagine the original plot and heavy handily add new characters with fresh excuses for slow motion fighting. Anyone unfamiliar with the first film will be a little bemused by the constant contrived references to what the never seen Leonidas and his 300 men are actually up to. Even the characters that do return, like Lena Headey’s Spartan Queen Gorgo and evil Persian warlord Xerxes, have little screen time or impact.

The Ugly Truth:

300: Rise of An Empire recreates the stylized look of Zack Snyder’s 2006 effort but fails to quite capture its angry macho magic. A superb villainous display from Eva Green rescues the film from being lost at sea. As a sequel the film essentially repeats the successful formula and plot of the original whilst making little changes beyond moving the action sequences onto the sea for a series of similar navel battles.

Overall devoted fans of the original will be pleased to see an unlikely sequel finally come to life, but it won’t win over those who don’t appreciate Zack Snyder’s trademark comicbook visuals.

Official Trailer below:

Paddington Bear Teaser Trailer

Here’s the first official teaser trailer for the forthcoming big screen adventures of Paddington Bear, the much beloved duffle coat wearing creation of classic children’s author Michael Bond.  Fusing live action and CGI the film will be based on an original screenplay rather than any of Paddington’s familiar adventures, with Mighty Boosh’s Paul King taking the helm to direct.

As the trailer is eager to remind us, Harry Potter producer David Heyman is also on board to help steer the iconic character into cinemas and the hearts of children worldwide. Check out your first glimpse of the bear in the hat below: